Investment needs and the forest finance gap.
To stop and reverse deforestation, annual forest finance needs to increase from US$ 84 billion to US$ 300 billion by 2030 and nearly US$ 500 billion by 2050. This chapter outlines these investment requirements and the US$ 216 billion annual finance gap.
This report estimates forest investment needs to reach climate, biodiversity and land degradation targets under the Rio Conventions which are relevant to the Glasgow Leaders’ Declaration on Forests and Land Use. The Declaration, which commits countries to “halt and reverse forest loss and land degradation by 2030”, calls for strengthened action on forest conservation, restoration, protection and sustainable management and emphasizes the need for increased finance and alignment of financial flows. This analysis assumes that the objective of halting and reversing forest loss and degradation is consistent with Rio targets of limiting global warming to below 1.5°C, halting biodiversity loss (including protecting 30 per cent of land and sea) and achieving land degradation neutrality by 2030. The analysis includes investment needs in six forest related nature-based solutions (NbS): avoided deforestation, reforestation, agroforestry (silvoarable and silvopastoral systems), protected forest areas and avoided forest peatland conversion. The estimates include the investment needed in those interventions and do not cover investment in enabling conditions (e.g. governance, law enforcement) or other forest-related activities not included in the model58, likely leading to underestimation. Still, they represent a substantial portion of the finance needed to deliver on the Glasgow goal.
The modeling relies on the ‘Model of Agricultural Production and its Impact on the Environment’ (MAgPIE), a global land use allocation model which explores land competition dynamics in the context of carbon policy, as well as on off-model analysis. Using policy input assumptions, MAgPIE estimates the least cost way in which the land use sector can meet demand for agricultural products while respecting planetary boundaries (e.g. food, climate, biodiversity and water security) and ensuring human wellbeing. Outputs from the model include cost of action and land use change.
Comments
Post a Comment